skip to main content

Each year, we conduct an employment trends study to measure attitudes and issues impacting the jobs of key players in the golf course maintenance industry. This year, we focused our study on an underappreciated but critical segment of our industry’s success: equipment managers. Questions focused on their careers, pathways into the industry, and other key trends. We received responses from 108 equipment managers and mechanics based at golf facilities across the U.S.

The results are sobering. The pipeline that produced the equipment managers running today's shops is gone. What's replacing it – if anything – is informal, inconsistent and nowhere near sufficient for what the industry needs. Here’s what we learned.

Finding #1: The Workforce Is Aging Out and the Pipeline Is Empty

The most urgent number, in our opinion, is not one we necessarily expected: 58% of the respondents have more than 20 years of experience in golf and turf and another 13% have between 15 and 20 years. That means more than 70% of the equipment managers who participated in our survey are into the back half of their careers. On the other end of the spectrum, only 5% of respondents have been in the field for five years or less. In addition, 43% said they are on their own in the shop with no assigned help, which makes the job tougher and the pipeline less robust.

The flow of up-and-coming equipment managers is down to a trickle and competition among facilities for experienced staff is fierce. Ford Motor Company recently announced it needs to hire 5,000 new mechanics for its dealership network, and they’re certainly not alone in searching for people with mechanical skill. The skilled trades pipeline is thin across every sector. In golf, it has effectively collapsed. That puts golf course maintenance departments in the unenviable position of having to compete with larger and better-known industries for current and future equipment managers.

The consequences of this imbalance are not theoretical. When a veteran equipment manager leaves a course – because of retirement, burnout or a better opportunity elsewhere – the average search and transition timeline can be several months under ideal conditions. In the current market, ideal conditions rarely exist. Courses that have not invested in succession planning will feel this acutely, and soon.

Finding #2: They’re Committed, But There Are Limits

Another compelling finding: 78% of respondents described themselves as “lifers” – professionals who love what they do and intend to stay in turf equipment management for the long term. That is a remarkable level of commitment, but employers should not take it for granted because there are limits.

When asked what would make them quit or move to a new employer, 50% cited a bad boss or bad culture as a top-three factor. Only poor compensation ranked higher as a reason to leave. 25% of respondents said they would “probably” leave the golf business tomorrow for a job in a similar mechanical career that offered better pay, hours and respect. An additional 11% said they would do so “in a heartbeat.” Equipment managers do not typically leave a course because they dislike the work. They leave because the environment around the work fails them and/or they aren’t being paid enough.

What does bad culture look like in practice? In our conversations with equipment managers, it looks like a superintendent who will not go to bat for headcount, tools or budget when support is needed. It looks like being excluded from morning meetings and operational planning. It looks like being treated as the 911 call rather than a member of the leadership team. It looks like an annual review that never happens, or only happens as an afterthought. Equipment managers who feel valued tend to stay. The ones who don't feel valued have plenty of options for other places to work.

Finding #3: Compensation Is a Symptom, Not the Disease

90% of respondents ranked compensation and benefits as a top factor in career decisions. That number is not surprising. What is surprising is what lies beneath it. More than three-quarters of respondents identified annual salary increases tied to performance or tenure as their most important benefit – ahead of health insurance (55%), retirement contributions (49%) and flexible time off (47%). This is not a demand for more money. It is a demand for a system. Equipment managers want to know that there is a consistent, documented process for evaluating their contribution and adjusting their compensation accordingly. Most courses do not have one.

The absence of that system can send a message that the role is not being managed with the same intentionality as other department head positions, a perception that can compound over time. Salary numbers are obviously important and can motivate equipment managers to look elsewhere, but so can the sense that their career trajectory is not something anyone at the course is thinking about.

We strongly believe courses that establish a formal compensation pathway tied to documented performance standards and market benchmarking will retain equipment managers – and any other role – at a higher rate than those that don't. The investment is modest. The return is operational stability.

Finding #4: Development Is Informal, Tribal and Insufficient

50% of respondents identified specialized training on important equipment lines as the most valuable form of professional development available to them. Paid attendance at industry meetings and conferences came in second at 15%. This data points toward a desire for structured education. But how much is out there?

The equipment manager knowledge base in golf is, by and large, informal and tribal. It is passed from the veteran to whomever happens to be in the shop when they leave. Sometimes that transition is intentional and well-managed. More often, it is not. The outgoing equipment manager retires or moves on, and the incoming technician – who often has limited golf-specific experience – inherits a shop full of equipment they may have never worked on, in an environment with no formal onboarding and no training pathway.

There is no formal program for training golf course equipment managers at scale today. Turf programs offer limited exposure to shop mechanics. Manufacturer training exists but it is uneven and brand-specific. The GCSAA's emerging certification program represents meaningful progress, but the gap between where the industry is and where it needs to be on equipment manager development is significant.

The courses that will navigate these murky waters best are the ones building internal pipelines now by identifying crew members with mechanical aptitude, creating structured shop time, and partnering with local distributors who can provide mobile training and technical support. That is not a comprehensive solution. But it is a start, and it is available today.

Finding #5: Tell Them How Much They Matter

A healthy 62% of respondents said they feel strongly respected within their operation. That is a positive headline. But it means that nearly 40% of active equipment managers do not feel strongly respected – and 6% say they are rarely respected at all.

48% rated their maintenance facility as modern and well-equipped. 33% described it as adequate but outdated. 12% said they lack the space and tools to do their jobs properly and 7% said their facility actively limits their ability to perform.

These numbers tell a story that goes beyond square footage and tool inventories. The quality of a maintenance facility is a physical signal of how much the course values the work that happens inside it. When an equipment manager walks into a shop that is cramped, outdated and under-resourced, they are likely to draw a conclusion about how the course views their role. That’s another reason for them not to stay.

Courses investing in modern maintenance facilities are not just improving operational efficiency. They are sending a message to every current and prospective employee in the building that their work matters. In a tight labor market, that message is a competitive advantage.

What It Means to Course Leadership

From our point of view, the equipment manager workforce is not on the verge of a crisis, it is already in one. The aging demographic, the absence of a meaningful pipeline, the cultural and developmental gaps that are quietly pushing committed professionals toward the exit – these are not warning signs of what might happen – they are descriptions of what is happening now.

The golf economy has never been stronger. Revenues are up. Golfer demand is high. Capital investment is flowing. That is exactly the wrong environment to be under-resourcing the part of the maintenance operation that keeps the product performing at the level expected.

Courses that act now – that formalize compensation pathways, invest in development, build internal pipelines, and create cultures where equipment managers feel like partners rather than utilities – will have a significant advantage when staffing shortages become impossible to ignore. Courses that wait will be competing for a shrinking pool of candidates at a premium they could have avoided.

The data is clear. The industry trends are clear. Investing thought and resources into this critical role can make a major difference in the success of golf course maintenance at your course now and in the future.