skip to main content

From the chatter of songbirds in the morning to the sight of a solitary hawk hunting in the evening, birds can play a wonderful role in our golf experiences. They are also a critical part of our ecosystem that is under threat from development, habitat loss and various other challenges. While golf courses are not a large land use in the context of the United States, they still account for approximately 2 million acres nationwide, including some of the last large open spaces in many urban and suburban areas. This means that the potential for supporting a wide variety of bird species on golf courses is significant. With recent research suggesting that the total number of birds in North America has declined by nearly 30% since 1970 – a net population loss approaching 3 billion birds (Rosenberg et al., 2019) – finding ways to make our golf courses more valuable as bird habitat is arguably more important than ever.

Fortunately, many of the most beneficial ways to support birds mesh nicely with ongoing efforts at many courses to reduce resource consumption, improve maintenance efficiency, offer activities beyond golf, and increase engagement with golfers and the surrounding community. Taking the following steps will help you support birds and ecosystem health at your golf course, and possibly improve the bottom line as well.

 

Understanding Your Site

Developing a good understanding of the birds that currently inhabit your site, or are likely to inhabit your site, is an important first step. This information guides planning and points you to actions that will have the most positive impact (Kress 2006, McKinney and Nightingale 2013). A good starting point is visiting websites like eBird that provide up-to-date information about the birds people are seeing in your area. However, the information on website databases may not cover the specific habitats of your golf course. Connecting with local chapters of the National Audubon Society and other birding groups is a great way to obtain more site-specific information. 

For most golf courses, the easiest and most beneficial step toward supporting bird species is preserving and expanding areas of native plants.
Almost all nest structures and bird feeders require maintenance to ensure they don’t become a hazard for the birds you are trying to help.

 

Sources

Burghardt, K., D Tallamy, C. Phillips, and K. Shropshire. Non-native plants reduce abundance, richness, and host specialization in lepidopteran communities. Ecosphere. 1(5): 1-22.

Golf Course Superintendents Association of America. 2017. Land use characteristics and environmental stewardship programs on U.S. golf courses. GCSAA.org.

Kress, S. 2006. The Audubon Society guide to attracting birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

Mason, J., C. Moorman, G. Hess, and K. Sinclair. 2007. Designing suburban greenways to provide habitat for forest-feeding birds. Landscape and Urban Planning. 80: 153-164.

Massachusetts Audubon. 2014. Managing forests for trees and birds in Massachusetts. MassAudubon.org.

McKinney, R. and M. Nightingale. 2013. A framework for enhancing bird habitat value of urban greenspaces in the Woonasquatucket watershed, Rhode Island, USA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Narango, D., D. Tallamy, P. Marra. 2017. Native plants improve breeding and foraging habitat for an insectivorous bird. Biological Conservation. 213(A): 42-50.

Northwest Natural Resource Group. 2019. Keeping dead wood and creating wildlife habitat piles: Some guidance for forest owners. NNRG.org.

Partners in Flight. 2016. Partners in Flight landbird conservation plan. Partnersinflight.org.

Penn State Extension. 2005. Dead wood for wildlife. Extension.PSU.edu.

Richie, M. 2016. Why native plants are better for birds and people. Audubon.org.

Rosenberg, K., A. Dokter, P. Blancher, J. Sauer, A. Smith, P. Smith, J. Stanton, A. Panjabi, L. Helft, M. Parr, P. Marra. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. 366(6461): 120-124.

Tallamy, D., and K. Shropshire. 2009. Ranking lepidopteran use of native versus introduced plants. Conservation Biology. 23(4): 941-947.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation.

 

Additional Resources

PDF Version