|

Using New Technology to Solve
an Old Problem: Trees




By David A. Oatis
Reprinted from the USGA Green Section Record
1997 May/June Vol 35(2): 20-21
After making more than 1,200 Turf Advisory Service visits
over the last nine years or so, I have come to the conclusion that
there are just two types of golf courses in North America: courses
that have already been over-planted with trees and courses that
eventually will be! Trees are an important part of landscapes and
a tremendous asset to many golf courses, but an overabundance of
trees can cause many different kinds of problems. For starters,
trees can cause playability problems; more significantly, they can
make it physically impossible to grow healthy, vigorous turfgrass.
Unfortunately, man seems to have a pathological urge to plant trees,
and golf courses are especially attractive sites due to their size.
Even if a vaccine to combat this seemingly genetic disorder were
developed tomorrow, it would be too late for the many courses that
have already become over-planted. In these cases the only solution
is tree removal.
Herein lies the crux of the problem: Few programs are less popular
than tree removal. In fact, tree removal is so unpopular that it
often is forbidden by golfers who love trees but do not understand
how important sunlight is to turfgrass. Several Turf Tips aimed
at increasing the awareness of tree-related concerns among golfers
and course officials have been presented over the years. This Turf
Tip is another in a long line of tree-related Turf Tips, but it
utilizes new technology to solve this old problem.
The idea comes from ArborCorn of Toronto and licensee Scott Robinson
from Arborists Tree Service in Bracebridge, Canada. It has been
used successfully at several courses, including Thornhill CC in
Toronto, Canada, where Keith Bartlett is the golf course superintendent.
Robinson uses a technique developed by ArborCorn that combines specially
designed software and sun location equipment. These tools allow
him to identify the exact position of the sun, at any hour of any
day, during the entire year. The information generated can then
be used to help decide which trees, and even which branches of trees,
need to be removed to increase sunlight penetration. The technique
will help quantify the additional light to be gained and can help
determine the potential value of the work if it is performed. This
information is extremely useful in weighing the intrinsic value
of a specific tree versus the increased light that would be generated
by its removal. With foresight, the program can also be used to
determine precisely where new trees should be planted to avoid future
controversy. As Scott Robinson put it, "This process removes the
guesswork by allowing me to pinpoint the exact location of the sun."
The technique is so accurate and effective that unnecessary tree
work is eliminated and, according to Superintendent Bartlett, "It
saves as many trees as it gets rid of."
A compass by itself simply does not provide enough information.
Computer software like ArborCorn's, which uses astronomic algorithms
to determine the sun's position throughout the year, is needed to
make better-informed decisions. The sun does not rise precisely
in the east, nor does it set precisely in the west, and the positions
vary considerably during the year. You might be surprised to realize
just how much the sun's positioning changes during the year. Here
is how the technique works:
A computer generates the sun's coordinates in 15-minute increments
for every day of the year, for a given geographic location (these
coordinates must be recomputed for courses more than 30 miles apart).
The sun location equipment is then set up in the shadiest portion
of the turf area in question. Coordinates for a chosen time and
day are entered into the equipment, which then indicates the position
of the sun. By inputting multiple dates and times, sunlight and
shade patterns can then be computed for various time periods throughout
the year. This sunlight survey can be performed at any time during
the year with equal accuracy.
This technique requires specialized equipment, data interpretation
skills, and a thorough knowledge of trees. More than likely, your
best bet is to hire an arborist with the technology and skill to
plot sun locations to provide the service for you. Here is a little
advice if you decide to give this technique a try:
- Have a tree crew present and equipped with radios. The offending
trees and/or branches can be removed as you survey each site
without having to rely on anyone's memory It is essential to
have a tree crew present in cases where several layers of plant
material exist around the site in question.
- Be sure to have course officials present for the assessment
so they can authorize the work. Visual proof can influence the
vote, and it is a good precaution to have witnesses.
- It is wise to shoot sun angles from multiple positions, so
don't just have your consultant set the sun location up on the
shadiest or weakest portion of the turf area. This is especially
important for sensitive situations, such as when the fate of
a favorite tree is in question.
- Carefully consider the time of day and the time of year when
increased sunlight penetration is most needed. Note that morning
light is the most critical to turfgrass, but eight hours of
direct light is the minimum considered necessary to produce
quality turfgrass.
- A competent golf course architect and Green Section agronomist
should also be included in the process to get different perspectives.
- For the more politically sensitive situations, have the sun
location consultant develop and present a report, complete with
pictures, diagrams, and a proposal for doing the necessary work.

This technique provides an easy and accurate means of documenting
the amount of sunlight fine turf areas receive at various times
during the year, and it helps identify which trees can be pruned
or removed to increase sunlight penetration. Perhaps most valuable
of all, this technique helps to assess the relative value of the
work before it is actually carried out, and this will insure that
you achieve the maximum effectiveness from your tree removal efforts.
Politically, you will not find a more valuable tool. Try harnessing
new science and technology to solve one of your oldest and biggest
problems!
David A. Oatis joined the USGA Green Section staff in 1988 as agronomist
for the Mid-Atlantic Region. He currently serves as Director of
the Northeastern Region.
|
|
|
|