When players are competing from different tees, why do you make a second
adjustment? top
Many players question the application of
Section 35, where players are competing from different sets of tees, or men
and women are competing from the same set of tees. This is a difficult concept
to understand and we are offering a few different ways to allow you to explain
this to your club members.
We need to define what the Slope Rating does, as many players think the different
Slope Ratings automatically take care of the difference in the two sets of tees.
This is a myth. The Slope Rating is used to convert a Handicap Index to a Course
Handicap, which allows the player to receive the number of strokes he needs to
play to the level of a scratch golfer for that particular set of tees. In other
words, it is the number of strokes he needs to play down to the Course Rating
for that particular set of tees.
Example
Player A: Handicap Index of 10.4
White set of tees: Course Rating of 71.1 and a Slope Rating of 130.
Course Handicap for player A on the white tees is a 12 (10.4 x 130/113).
He needs 12 strokes to play down to the level of a scratch golfer on the white
set of tees. The scratch golfer is what the Course Rating is based upon, so that
is 71.1. For the Course Handicap of 12 to play down to the level of a scratch
golfer, he would need to shoot 71.1 + 12, or 83.1, which we will round to 83.
So, if player A plays to his Course Handicap by shooting 83, he would tie the
scratch golfer shooting 71 on the white set of tees. Now, we have found a way
for a golfer to compete against a player with a different skill level from a
specific set of tees.
Player B: Handicap Index of 10.4
Blue set of tees: Course Rating of 73.2 and a Slope Rating of 140.
Course Handicap for player B on the blue tees is 13 (10.4 x 140/113).
Player B needs 13 strokes to play down to the level of a scratch golfer for this
particular blue set of tees. As we said earlier, the scratch golfer is what the
Course Rating is based upon, and on the blue set of tees that is 73.2. For the
Course Handicap of 13 to play down to the level of a scratch golfer, he would
need to shoot 73.2 + 13 or 86.3, which we will round to 86. So, if player B
plays to his Course Handicap by shooting 86, he would tie the scratch golfer
shooting 73 on the blue set of tees. Great, again we have found a way for a
golfer to compete against a player with a different skill level from a
specific set of tees.
So now the two nonscratch players decide to compete against one another; Player
A from the white tees and Player B from the blue tees. We have determined their
Course Handicap when they were going to play someone else from the same set of
tees, but that is no longer the case. However, we have already determined that
player A needs 12 strokes to play down to a scratch for the white set of tees
and player B needs 13 strokes to play down to the level of a scratch player for
the blue set of tees. If both players play exactly to their Course Handicap,
player A scores 83 for a net of 71 and player B scores 86 for a net of 73.
Player A wins every time if they shoot to their Course Handicap, as 71 is better
than 73. This is because the Course Handicaps were set up allowing each player
to score down to the level of the scratch golfer for the specific set of tees
they are playing. SLOPE allows one to compete with someone from the same set of
tees, but in our example the players are not playing the same set of tees.
Now, we have to standardize/equalize the Course Ratings in order for the two
players to compete equitably. The same thing would apply when two scratch
players chose to play from these two different sets of tees. A scratch golfer
would shoot a 71 from the white tees and another scratch golfer would shoot a 73
from the blue tees. Because the player playing the blue tees is playing a course
with a higher Course Rating (more difficult set of tees), we must equalize the
difference in Course Ratings in order to do any type of comparison or
competition. This applies to every golfer, no matter what their level of skill,
as all the Slope Rating has done is given a player enough strokes to play down
to the level of a scratch for the specific set of tees.
Back to our net players A and B. Because player B is playing a set of tees with a
higher Course Rating, we must add the difference between the two Course Ratings
to his Course Handicap if he is going to compete with someone else from a
different set of tees. 73.2 (blue)  71.1 (white) = 2.1, which we round to 2. So
player B will add two strokes to his 13, resulting in a Course Handicap of 15.
Now let's look at the competition if both players score to their Course
Handicap:
Target Score 
83 
86 
Course Handicap 
12 
13 
Diff. in Rating 

2 
Net Score 
71 
71 
We have reached our desired goal. Both players have scored to their Course
Handicap and their net score results in a tie.
Common thoughts:
 My Handicap Index converts to the same Course Handicap from two different
sets of tees. This system must be screwed up because I definitely score higher
on the longer set of tees and I need more strokes. Example, a player has a
Handicap Index of 10.4. The white set of tees has a Course Rating of 70.9 and a
Slope Rating of 118. The blue tee has a Course Rating of 73.1 and a Slope Rating
of 122. In both cases 10.4 converts to a Course Handicap of 11. As we learned in
Example 1, the Slope Rating allows us to receive enough strokes to play to the
level of a scratch golfer from a particular set of tees. So, when this player
plays the white set of tees, he needs 11 strokes to play down to the Course
Rating of 70.9. When he plays the blue set of tees, he needs 11 strokes to play
down to the Course Rating of 73.1. So, to play to his Course Handicap, he needs
to score 70.9 + 11 = 81.9 or 82 from the white tees and 73.1 + 11 = 84.1 or 84
from the blue tees. The system recognizes the difficulty difference in the two
sets of tees, but it doesn't show up until we take into account both the Course
Rating and the Slope Rating.
 A player develops a Handicap Index from a certain set of tees, so a 10.4 who
plays all the time from the blue tees is better than the 10.4 who plays from the
white set of tees. Another way to read this is that a player develops a
Handicap Index from a specific set of tees. In our last example, we said the
white tees had a Course Rating of 70.9 and a Slope Rating of 118. What would a
player have to average with his ten best scores/differentials to become a 10.4?
Let's skip the 96 percent factor in the formula to make it easier to determine.
First, we need to determine how to calculate a handicap differential. It is the
adjusted gross score minus the Course Rating multiplied by a 113 STANDARD for
Slope Rating, divided by the Slope Rating of the tees played. 81.8  70.9 x
113/118 = 10.4. So if a player averaged 81.8 on his ten best differentials, the
result would be 10.4. If a blue tee player averaged 81.8, the result would be
8.1 (81.8  73.1 x 113/122). Result: Shooting the same score from different sets
of tees does not result in the same Handicap Index.
For a player averaging 84.3 from the blue tees, the resulting Handicap Index
would be 10.4 (84.3  73.1 x 113/122). The combination of the differences in
Course Ratings, plus the weighting of the Slope Rating shows that a blue tee
player averaging 2.5 strokes higher than the white tee player would result in
the same Handicap Index. This is how we determine which ten rounds to count in
your Handicap Index, whether played from the blue tee at your course, the white
tee at your course or the blue tees at Pebble Beach.
Nowhere in the above information did we mention the word par. Players
often try to throw par into the mix when trying to figure if scores are equal.
Par is of little relevance in the handicap system and is a terrible indicator of
predicting score. For example, one course may be 5500 yards long and have a par
of 72 and another may be 7200 yards long and have a par of 72. It is highly
unlikely that scores on these two courses would be equal for any level of
golfer.
In each of the examples, we have used both Course Rating and Slope Rating. The
point is that Slope Rating by itself has little meaning within the Handicap
System. There must be a Course Rating standard to connect/attach to the Slope
Rating in order for there to be any meaning. If there is one thing to remember
from all of this, it is that the Slope Rating is used to convert a Handicap
Index to a Course Handicap, which allows the player to receive the number of
strokes he needs to play to the level of a scratch golfer for that particular
set of tees.
Please see FAQ 8 when considering application or
nonapplication of this policy.
If a club has players competing against one another from tees with different
ratings, can it choose to ignore Section 35/93 of the USGA Handicap System?
top
No. Please see the following letter that is now sent out regarding this subject:
In regard to your inquiry, we want to clearly note the USGA's position regarding
handicap competitions in which players are competing from tees where there are
different USGA Course Ratings(tm). Sections 35 of the USGA Handicap System® and
Rule 62 of the Rules of Golf ® both apply in this situation.
Rule 62b, which references Stroke Play, in part states, "In any round of a
handicap competition, the competitor shall ensure that his handicap is recorded
on his score card before it is returned to the Committee."
Section 35, which references differences in Course Ratings, in part states,
"...the player playing from the set of tees with the higher USGA Course Rating
receives additional strokes equal to the difference between the Course Ratings,
with .5 or greater rounded upward. The additional strokes are added to the
Course Handicap(tm) of the player playing from the higherrated set of tees."
For more information on the background of Section 35 and why it is applied, the
USGA can provide you with a "white paper" on the subject. This information is
also available on the USGA/s web site, www.usga.org or more specifically at
www.usga.org/handicap/faq/7.html.
A player applying Section 35 is proceeding correctly in an effort to satisfy the
requirements of Rule 62. A committee does not have the power to adopt a
Condition of Competition that waives this procedure, as that would be a
violation of Rule 331, which includes the following wording, "The Committee has
no power to waive a Rule of Golf."
The USGA Handicap System has been developed so that competitions from different
tees utilizing the differences in Course Ratings can result in equitable
competition. We encourage golf clubs to offer competitive opportunities
following this philosophy. This letter emphasizes that attempting to ignore this
is a violation the Rules of Golf and the USGA Handicap System. If a golf club is
issuing Handicap Indexes® to its members, it is expected that the club will
follow the Rules of Golf and the USGA Handicap System. A club is subject to loss
of the ability to utilize the USGA Handicap System as summarized in Handicap
Decision 12/1:
12/1. Club's Policies Not in Compliance With the USGA Handicap System
The USGA requires that a club's policies be in compliance with the Rules of Golf
and the USGA Handicap System for the members' handicaps at that club to be USGA
Handicap Indexes. If the USGA is notified in writing that a club is not
complying, what action will the USGA take?
A: If notified in writing, the USGA will request the authorized golf association
in the area to contact the club about policies not in compliance.
If that association is unable to get the club to comply, the USGA will advise the
club in writing that without compliance the club may not issue USGA Handicap
Indexes to its members, may not use any part of the USGA Handicap System, and
may not use USGA trademarks in any manner. If a club refuses to comply, the USGA
will inform other USGA member clubs in the region that the club's right to issue
USGA Handicap Indexes has been withdrawn. The USGA will not accept an entry into
USGA Championships from any member of this club. As a practical matter, this
last action rarely becomes necessary.
Thank you for making an inquiry on this subject. The USGA appreciates your
support in promoting its policies.