| | Davis: Chambers Bay Ideal U.S.
Open Site
 March 5, 2008
Folks in the Pacific Northwest and Mike Davis, the
USGA's Senior Director of Rules & Competitions, are
rejoicing in the fact that in 2015 Chambers Bay, a
spectacular municipal links layout locate on the scenic lower
Puget Sound in University Place, Wash., will become the
region's first course to host a U.S. Open. In 2010,
Chambers Bay will also be the host site for the U.S. Amateur
Championship.
Davis recently answered questions about the most recent
addition to the USGA's U.S. Open calendar.
Why is Chambers Bay a spectacular U.S. Open site?
Davis:
When we examine a potential U.S. Open site, we look at the
golf course first. It has to be a great test of golf for the
world's best players. Chambers Bay most definitely meets
that standard. It has an excellent variety of golf holes -
short, long, uphill, downhill and holes that dogleg in both
directions. Further, Chambers Bay has its fair share of
risk-reward shots, which nearly everyone in golf seems to
like. One element that intrigued us was that Chambers Bay
will be much different than any other U.S. Open test because
the whole golf course, including the putting greens, is
planted in fine fescue grasses. The entire site is sand. It
will play much like a British Open course with balls bouncing
after they land. We always want firm conditions for a
championship and we will surely get them at Chambers Bay. The
idea of a "bouncy" Open greatly appeals to us. The
fescue greens will putt slower than other Open venues, but
they'll still provide great challenge given the wonderful
architecture. The fescue roughs will be wispy and have a
different look and playability than most other Opens. It kind
of gets us away from what sometimes can be perceived as a
"cookie cutter" U.S. Open set-up. Chambers Bay will
be tough like any U.S. Open test, but it will be a different
type of tough. Beyond the golf course, Chambers Bay is open
to the public and is located in the Pacific Northwest. Since
the first U.S. Open was held in 1895, we've never had a
western U.S. Open north of San Francisco. The course sits on
just under 1,000 acres, so it more than meets our operational
needs. One last thing that makes Chambers Bay a
"can't miss" - it is simply spectacular
looking. Every hole has water views.
 | | The first hole at Chambers Bay offers
a spectacular view of Puget Sound. (Photo Courtesy of
Chambers Bay) | The vast expanses of sand struck your imagination, but how
do you plan to use that factor in a U.S. Open
Championship?
Davis:
A sand-based terrain makes the course play firm and fast. The
effects of a rain event are minimized due to better drainage.
When a championship is played on a parkland-style course with
thick soil, rain can minimize the challenge of the course.
Given that Chambers Bay is sand-based with fescue grasses,
the ball is going to bounce and they'll have to plan
their course strategy accordingly. The architects of Chambers
Bay designed the holes with the ground game in mind. We play
the U.S. Open on other sand-based courses such as Pinehurst,
Shinnecock Hills, Bethpage and Olympic, but none of those
courses have fescue fairways or greens that really get the
ball rolling.
Who first called your attention to Chambers Bay?
Davis:
I got a call from Ron Read (USGA Director, Regional Affairs,
West Region) several years ago. The course had not been built
but he mentioned this fabulous site on the water in the
Pacific Northwest. The things that piqued my interest beyond
geography were the 1,000 acres, that it was open to the
public and that it was on the water. And, it was all sand. I
thought it had the potential to be a perfect championship
site if a golf course ever did get built. I asked Ron to keep
me posted. I was thereafter contacted a few years ago when
they first started moving sand to build the course. John
Ladenburg, who is the Pierce County Executive and an avid
golfer, told me of his dream to have a U.S. Open. He had seen
the Bethpage U.S. Open in 2002 and it motivated him. After
finishing teaching a Rules of Golf seminar in Portland a
couple of years ago, I drove up with a few others from the
USGA and we walked the site. We studied the proposed course
routing crafted by the architectural firm of Robert Trent
Jones II. Bulldozers were just beginning to shape the
property. The Pierce County representatives and the
architects asked a lot of good questions about what we felt
made a good test of golf for the world's best golfers, as
well as the things we looked for from a logistical
standpoint. I suspect that they began to more seriously think
about the U.S. Open since a few people from the USGA actually
were willing to spend a day looking over the site before it
even was a golf course.
What qualities must a golf course have in order to host a
U.S. Open or U.S. Amateur?
Davis:
Simply put, the golf course has to be able to test all the
skills of those given groups of players. With that in mind,
part of the charm of all USGA national championships is that
they are played on different courses each year. Some courses
fit certain player's games better than others. That is
appealing. When we look at a prospective golf course, we try
to envision how it would play under championship set-up. We
also have to make sure the logistics work and that the host
venue and community are excited and capable of conducting an
event. We want the very best courses we can get to determine
our respective national champions.
Why is the U.S. Open seldom played on new golf
courses?
Davis:
I suppose going to old traditional golf courses is part of
the history of the U.S. Open. Many of the old courses have
more than stood the test of time. If you look at where we
tend to go, most of the courses were built in the so-called
"Golden Era" of golf course architecture
(1910-1940). We did play the U.S. Open at several newer
courses (Hazeltine, Bellerive, Atlanta Athletic Club and
Champions) back in the 1960s and 1970s, but we have shied
away in recent decades of going to courses that were just
built. Our choosing Chambers Bay is great in the sense that
it perhaps makes a statement that today's golf course
architects are building some of the best golf courses yet.
With all the fabulous golf courses built in the last 10 or so
years, we might just be in midst of the second "Golden
Era" of architecture.
Each time a course is mentioned for a USGA championship,
someone says, "Mike Davis was here and inspected the
course." Are you always on the road surveying potential
sites?
Davis:
I am glad you didn't ask my family this question!
Seriously, I have tried to limit the majority of my site
visits to venues interested in hosting U.S. Opens, U.S.
Women's Opens, U.S. Amateurs and Walker Cups. The travel
with the job can be extensive, but very rewarding. There are
so many wonderful golf courses in this country that are
willing to give something back to the game.
|